作者: adada (A New Beginning!) 站內: Protection
標題: Re: [新聞] 半罩式安全帽 較不傷頸椎
時間: Tue Dec 18 10:31:31 2007
※ 引述《cire (SomeWhereOnlyWeKnow)》之銘言：
> 唉自己戴全罩好幾年了
> 從便宜幾百塊的全罩
> 到現在cp值也不錯的afx
> 看到這報導真的有點無言
> 雖然戴半罩會爆頭
> 可是全罩又被這位權威說的那麼恐怖
> 我看還是靠自己小心比較安全啊~!!!
> 半罩式安全帽 較不傷頸椎 更新日期:2007/12/18 04:39 張翠芬／台北報導
> 台灣地區機車數量驚人，但讓脊髓醫學權威楊詠威醫師更訝異的是，到處都可看見機車
> 騎士配戴全罩式安全帽。由於全罩式安全帽容易導致頸椎骨折全身癱瘓，他建議有關當
> 局應正視這個問題。
> 據統計，在大陸平均每百萬人當中，有64位為脊損患者；台灣是50人/每百萬，而美國
> 是35人/每百萬，而香港是每百萬人口中有10人為脊損患者。香港的比例如此低是因為香
> 港沒有機車，車速也很慢。而台灣因為機車眾多，導致脊髓損傷比例頗高。
> 楊教授表示，全罩式設計雖然可以保護頭部撞擊的外傷，但對頸椎卻會造成嚴重傷害
> 。美國在1967年，曾針對美式足球運動員因全罩式安全帽導致頸椎骨折癱瘓而做研究，
> 由於全罩式的後面帽緣剛好卡在頸椎部位，足球運動員頭部受到撞擊之後，雖然保護了
> 頭部，但頸椎反而被安全帽後緣撞碎。
> 現在，美式足球已將安全帽改成半罩式，運動員頸椎受傷的比率也大為降低。一般來
> 說，自行車選手的安全帽就是半罩式，不會傷害到頸椎。楊教授建議台灣有關當局能留
> 意這個問題，請騎士改戴半罩式安全帽或重新改良機車安全帽的設計。
http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~hcsci/hospital/sci/wise/young.htm
這位權威的資料 可見不能過於武斷啊 治療﹦/﹦預防
我寫了篇文打算email給他 有沒有另有高人願意指點的？
Dear Dr. Young,
I'm a huge motorcycling fan in Taiwan.
I just read your article about the safety of motorcycle helmets
on the internet on Yahoo.
In this article, you mentioned that full-faced helmets are more dangerous than
open-faced ones.
I tend to disagree with your point of view.
I have to strongly oppose your idea, because within a certain range of speed,
a full-faced helmet offers statistically better protection than an open one.
Yes, as you said, there is a slight chance of hurting the neck, however,
you would probably still be alive.
This is especially true for when the collision occurs at the front of the head.
With the possibility of hurting the neck, many safety gear companies
have developed systems avoiding this situation. For example, Hans system
applied in Formula 1 (http://www.f1nutter.co.uk/tech/hans_device.php),
general neck supporters (http://search.ebay.co.uk/neck-brace ),
and a more professional KTM neck brace
(http://www.ktm.co.uk/Neck-Brace-Special.1299.19.html).
I have had the experience of twice hitting my head to the ground at the speed
of 30-40 km/hr. If it were not that I wore a full-faced helmet both times,
I could have probably hurt my jaws or ruined my face.
However, I finished both trips successfully and I am able to write
this message for you.
As a martial art lover,
I happen to know that our jaw is a very weak part of the head.
For example, if there were a strong force heading towards the jaw,
the jaw would be easily broken and the force would directly head towards
the hindbrain and snowball into even more serious injuries.
If the speed went above 100 km/hr and you hit an object with your bike,
it would not really matter what you wore at that time. However, if the force
was within the range that our neck could tolerate, surely a full face helmet
is a much better choice!
--
事出必有因 所以沒有找不到線索的問題
只是
真的找到問題的源頭了嗎
--
╭┼ Origin: 玩車人的天地 ˙東吳機研站 scumotor.com.tw ┼╯ Author: adada從 219-84-187-239-adsl-tai.dynamic.so-net.net.tw 發表╰╮Modify: 07/12/18 10:33:08 ╰╮Modify: 07/12/18 10:41:05
→ archranger推：其實 我很有興趣直接找他的該篇論文出來看 07/12/18
→ archranger推：我不相信記者文中描述的那樣 一篇醫學論文可以這麼 07/12/18
→ archranger推：不嚴謹 一定有很多是記者看不懂就硬搬上報導的東西 07/12/18
→ adada推：沒錯 我相信他是直接援用美式足球的例子 07/12/18
→ adada推：所以告知他這件事 希望他有學術精神去把這事搞清楚 07/12/18
→ COLD推：NCTU...嘖嘖嘖... 07/12/18
→ archranger推：樓上 這跟NCTU無關啦 借用交大網頁空間架的網站而已 07/12/18
→ OUCHRUSH推：你應該先確定記者沒有誤導人家意思之後再寄出比較好 07/12/18
→ impraza推：Football有多少撞擊是蓄意對著頭部 這根本不能當實驗 07/12/18
→ impraza推：組吧 常看football 上半身 腰際的撞擊 或針對接球員 07/12/18
→ impraza推：的衝撞 多少是對著頭去的XD太多了 落地姿勢也很恐怖 07/12/18